Apr 24, 2008

Mutual Funds News 24 Apr 2008

24 Apr 2008 | 10:47 Kotak MF declares dividend

Kotak Mutual Fund has declared dividend under the dividend option of Kotak FMP 13M Series 2 (under both retail and institutional plan).

The fund house has fixed 29 April 2008 as the record date for the payment of dividend. It proposes the entire distributable surplus available on the record date, as dividend subject to deduction of applicable dividend distribution tax.

Pursuant to payment of dividend, the NAV would fall to the extent of dividend payout and statutory levy, if applicable. All unit holders registered on or before the record date would be eligible to receive the dividend.

The NAVs of the retail and institutional plans under the scheme, recorded as on 22 April 2008 were Rs 10.1151 and Rs 10.0931 respectively.

24 Apr 2008 | 14:27 iFast, Deutsche Bank AMC tie up

The asset management arm of global banking major Deutsche Bank and iFast Corporation Singapore have entered into an agreement to set up an independent mutual fund distribution platform in India.

The distribution platform will be for retail investors and Independent Financial Advisors, a release here stated.

iFast Corporation owns and operates Singapore's largest mutual fund investment platform for financial advisers and financial institutions.

The business will be controlled by iFast and carry its name while a local Indian team will be recruited to operate the firm.

Deutsche Bank's Asset Management division, through Deutsche Asia Pacific Holdings Pte Ltd, Singapore, will pick up a minority stake in the venture, the release added.

The venture's first offering will be the online mutual fund distribution portal Fundsupermart.com, which will allow retail investors to invest in mutual fund products of various asset management companies in India.

The portal will offer tools to users to compare mutual fund products, check the value of their holdings and perform calculations.

iFast is a proven, entirely internet-based operation which gives us tremendous competitive advantages in terms of scalability, technology and responsiveness, company Group Executive Director Moh Hon Meng said.

iFast has already expanded to Hong Kong and Malaysia.

UNDER-PRICING AND LONG-RUN PERFORMANCE OF INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS (IPOs) IN INDIAN STOCK MARKET

UNDER-PRICING AND LONG-RUN PERFORMANCE OF INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS IN INDIAN STOCK MARKET

Dr. S. Janakiramanan Associate professor Singapore Management University SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY (LEE KONG CHIAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS)

INTRODUCTION

The transition from being a private company to a public one is one of the most

important events in the life of a firm. It is also one of particular interest to institutional investors, and the transition is facilitated through the initial public offering (IPO) process. The IPO provides a fresh source of capital that is critical to the growth of the firm and provides the founder and other shareholders such as venture capitalists a liquid market for their shares. From an institutional investor's perspective, the IPO provides an opportunity to share in the rewards of the growth of the firm. When a firm issues equity to the public for the first time, it makes an initial public offering consisting of two kinds of issues – the primary issue and the follow-on issue. In a primary, the firm raises capital for itself by selling stock to the public, whereas in the followon issue, existing large shareholders sell to the public a substantial number of shares they currently own. It is a well documented fact that IPOs tend to be generally under-priced, though some issues tend to be overpriced. From the viewpoint of financial research, IPO under-pricing in the sense of abnormal short-term returns on IPOs has been found in nearly every country in the world. This suggests that IPO under-pricing may be the outcome of basic problems of information and uncertainty in the IPO process, and is unlikely to be a figment of institutional peculiarities of any one market. There have also been various studies made to suggest the reasons for such underpricing. From the investors’ point of view, this under-pricing appear to provide the sure and quick profit that most dream about. Though first day return could vary, few of the issues tend to provide a very high return over the first day. One of the examples is VA Linux which had a first day return of 700%. It is also seen that for some of the issues, the first day return could also be negative. It then becomes inevitable for most investors to measure the performance of IPOs by the short term (usually within one week of issue), as the general scheme is to buy the shares at a low initial offering price and sell it the next day when the price increases. Pricing of the IPOs are done by the issuers with guidance from underwriters from investment banks. There are various ways to price the stocks but what is commonly used now is a process called book building. It is basically a capital issuance process used in an Initial Public Offer which aids price and demand discovery. It is also a process used for marketing a public offer of equity shares of a company. During the period for which the book for the IPO is open, bids are collected from investors at various prices, which are above or equal to the floor price. The offer/issue price is then determined by the issuing company after the bid closing date based on the various bids that have been collected. For a more detailed discussion of book building, one can visit any of the many stock exchanges. An example of the book building process can be seen from the National Stock Exchange. This Initial Public Offering can also be made through the fixed price method or a combination of both book building and the fixed price method. There have been various studies conducted on the price changes of the shares after prolonged periods (six months to five years). These studies show that while the short-run performance of IPOs is often quite impressive, the long-run performance over the subsequent three to five years is not as impressive. Excluding the initial-day return, IPOs tend to underperform various benchmarks. However, these studies focus mainly on eveloped economies and tend to neglect the developing counterparts. A study by Madhusoodanan and Thiripalraju studies the performance of Indian IPOs prior to 1996. It is in the hope that the long term performance of IPOs in developing economies can also be a useful indicator to the potential investor that this study is to be undertaken. The purpose of this paper is to examine the long-run performance of IPOs in Indian stock market which were issued during 2000-2001. The IPO literature has shown that the IPO issues and performance is based on a cycle. In some years there are a large number of IPOs while in some years, there are only a few IPOs. When it is a vintage year with a large number of IPOs, most IPOs tend to do well on the first day but tend to do poorly over a long term whereas in years when there are only a few IPOs, the results tend to be mixed. The long run performance is likely to be affected while we include IPOs from different time periods because the market movements in different market conditions are likely to be different. In order to see that results are not confounded by the time period when IPO was issued, it was decided to include IPOs that were issued within a one-year period. This has resulted in a sample of 116 companies which had IPOs in this period from various industries. This study is important mainly because the Indian stock market has been performing very well from the year 2001 and our research wants to show whether this performance is due to the established firms or the performance also gets to the newly issued shares through IPOs. The study uses various methods to ascertain the significance of the over or underperformance of IPOs. Among the many reasons for the performance which we see, one of them could be the sensitivity of the results to the choice of benchmarks. Dimson and Marsh, Ritter, Gregory et al, Fama and French and Fama have successively demonstrated the sensitivity of the long-run performance of the IPOs the benchmark used in the study. For this reason, the effect of various benchmarks on the return measurements will be studied so as to elucidate the possibility that the magnitude of the performance is benchmark dependent.

Full Report - Download


RBI increases CRR (Cash Reserve Ratio)

RBI increases CRR

It may be recalled that in the Third Quarter Review of the Annual Statement of the Monetary Policy for the year 2007-08, the stance of monetary policy was set out. The review had stated that over the period ahead, liquidity management will continue to assume priority in the conduct of monetary policy. It was further stated that the liquidity conditions are being shaped by several underlying factors and their developments have implications for liquidity management going forward and warrant appropriate and timely action.

The liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) had been in an injection mode persistently during the second half of March 2008. Subsequently, there was a large turnaround and, an average amount of Rs.40,088 crore was absorbed through the LAF during April 3-17, 2008 as against average daily injection of liquidity of Rs. 27,385 crore during March 17-31, 2008.

Year-on-year WPI inflation, which was 3.83 per cent on January 12, 2008, i.e., at the time of the announcement of Third Quarter Review, increased to 7.41 per cent on March 29, 2008 and remained at 7.14 per cent as on April 5, 2008 and its overall impact on inflation expectations requires to be monitored and moderated.

In the light of the current macroeconomic, monetary and anticipated liquidity conditions, and with a view to containing inflation expectations, it is essential to take appropriate action on an urgent basis.

On a review of current liquidity situation, it is considered desirable to increase the cash reserve ratio (CRR) of the scheduled commercial banks, regional rural banks (RRBs), scheduled state co-operative banks and scheduled primary (urban) co-operative banks by 50 basis points to 8.0 per cent in two stages, effective from specified fortnights as indicated below:

Effective date
(i.e., the fortnight beginning from)

CRR on net demand and time liabilities (per cent)

April 26, 2008

7.75

May 10, 2008

8.00

As a result of the above increase in CRR on liabilities of the banking system, an amount of about Rs.18,500 crore of resources of banks would be absorbed.

Alpana Killawala
Chief General Manager

Press Release: 2007-08/1351

Government-owned Investment Vehicles and Capital Flows: Indian Perspective

Government-owned Investment Vehicles and Capital Flows: Indian Perspective


(Remarks by Dr. Y.V. Reddy, Governor, RBI at a session on 'The Role of Government-owned Investment Vehicles in Global Capital Flows' in the International Capital Markets and Emerging Markets Roundtable held at Washington DC on April 14, 2008)

Chairman Bill Rhodes, distinguished speakers and fellow participants,

        I am thankful to the organisers for inviting me to participate in the Roundtable on a subject of great contemporary relevance. The invite has provoked me to deliberate on the subject, hear distinguished speakers and also meet here to interact with friends.

        We know that government-owned investment vehicles (GIVs), also referred to as Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs), existed for long but they have acquired significance very recently due to their proliferation, growth in size and, above all, active participation in capital infusion in the aftermath of the recently observed financial turbulence. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has to be complimented for its pioneering work and excellent document on the subject. The role of SWFs in global capital flows is also being debated in several fora, namely, the O.E.C.D., the G7 Ministers, the European Commission, the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the Central Banking Publications, the G 30, the Institute of International Finance and the World Economic Forum.

Towards Greater Transparency

        It is useful to recognise in the above context that, of late, there have been initiatives to increase the transparency of all kinds of pools of capital as evidenced by the reports of the U.K. Hedge Fund Working Group (January 2008), led by Sir Andrew Large, and the Private Equity Working Group on Transparency and Disclosure (November 2007), led by Sir David Walker.

        Briefly stated, while there is intense debate on the subject of comfort with SWFs in global capital flows, the present discussion could be considered both as a part of the wider and significant debate on transparency and regulation of certain broad categories of investors and also as one that addresses specific factors relevant to one category, namely SWFs. It is useful to recognise in this regard that there is an overlap among the categories in terms of sources of finance since SWFs invest on their own account and also through hedge funds and private equity funds. In other words, one of the broader issues is regulatory safeguards in place with regard to investors of a kind that may not necessarily assure regulatory comfort to the host country. A related, and in a way the other side of the coin, is the transparency and governance arrangements in regard to operation of SWFs in the home country.  It is heartening to note that the IMF has begun covering in its Global Financial Stability Report, in addition to the SWFs, the issues relating to hedge funds and private equity funds.

Public Policy Initiatives on SWFs

        The OECD approach in regard to SWFs is that international co-operation can build mutual trust and keep markets open. The OECD Investment Committee and its non-OECD partners have agreed that over the coming period they will follow a two-track approach to these issues. First track would involve dialogue among governments, SWFs and the private sector to improve understanding of both home and host country approaches to foreign investment. The second track would involve exchange of experiences in relation to national security protection, developing shared views on investment policies that observe the principles of proportionality, transparency and predictability, accountability, and that also avoid unnecessary restrictions to international investment, including by SWFs.

        The OECD has recently, on 4 April 2008, released a report which is intended to develop guidance for recipient country policies toward investments from SWFs. The OECD has also proposed to work on how governments can maintain their commitment to open international investment policies – including for SWFs – while also protecting essential security interests. The resulting framework is expected to foster mutually beneficial situations where SWFs enjoy fair treatment in the markets of recipient countries and these countries can confidently resist protectionist pressures.

        The European Commission (EC) is proposing a common EU approach to respond to concerns over SWFs and enhance the transparency, predictability and accountability of SWFs' investments while maintaining an open investment environment. It has laid out the principles which should shape that approach. These are (a) commitment to an open investment environment both in the EU and elsewhere, including in third countries that operate SWFs; (b) support of multilateral work, in international organisations such as the IMF and OECD; (c) use of existing instruments at EU and Member State level; (d) respect of EC Treaty obligations and international commitments, for example in the WTO framework; and (e) proportionality and transparency.

        The recent joint release by United States, Abu Dhabi and Singapore sets out Policy Principles for the SWFs as well as the countries receiving SWF investment. The responsibilities enjoined upon SWFs mainly relate to greater transparency in areas such as purpose, investment objectives, institutional arrangements, and financial information, strong governance structures, internal controls, and operational and risk management systems and the need to respect host-country rules by complying with all applicable regulatory and disclosure requirements of the countries in which they invest. The prescriptions for the SWF host countries stress on transparent inward investment rules, which are  'publicly available, clearly articulated, predictable, and supported by strong and consistent rule of law' and favour non-discriminatory treatment for SWFs vis-à-vis other foreign investors.

        Of particular interest from a host country perspective, is the Media Release of the Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia in February 2008, which illustratively lays down a set of principles to enhance the transparency of Australia's foreign investment screening regime. The principles set out the main factors that are considered during the screening, which include determining on a case by case basis and consistency with national interest; while assessing the national interest in any given case, a balanced view against principles is proposed. The principles set out the additional factors that need to be considered in relation to investment proposals by foreign governments and their agencies, over and above those that apply to normal private sector proposals. While the Australian Government welcomes foreign investment, the purposes of Australia's foreign investment screening is to ensure consistency with their national interest. The Treasurer can reject proposals that are deemed contrary to the national interest or impose conditions on them to address the national interest concerns. The concerns may relate to Australia's national security or economic development. The examination includes implications for other government policies, competition and operations of Australia's businesses.

        Recent reports suggest that Germany is contemplating a legislation which will enable it to block 'unwanted' investments by SWFs. The proposed law is expected to enable scrutiny of all investments where the investor's stake in the investee entity is likely to exceed 25 per cent, even up to three months after the investment has been made. This concern seems to stem from the suspicion that some of the SWFs may be driven by 'political and other motivations' and not purely by economic and commercial considerations.
           
India as a Host Country

        In India, the regulatory regime governing capital inflows does not recognise SWFs as a distinct category. Hence, their investments are subject to normal regulations governing capital flows under the category of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Foreign Institutional Investments (FII). In regard to some sectors, such as banking and financial market infrastructure companies, there are limits on individual holdings and the investment proposals are subject to an element of due diligence processing with regard to fit and proper requirements. For this purpose, no discrimination is made between a domestic investor and a foreign investor, or between SWFs and others, as long as the policy criteria are met. Let me further elaborate on this position.

        The existing FDI policy permits investments under the 'automatic route' and the 'approval route' in most, though not all, of the activities. Under the automatic route, the investors are allowed to invest in the identified sectors up to the threshold specified for those sectors, without the need for a prior approval from regulators or the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). In respect of the other sectors, the investors will need a prior approval of the FIPB, before undertaking any investment. The FIPB is functioning under the aegis of the Ministry of Finance and comprises representatives of various government departments, who are expected to ensure that the proposed investment addresses the administrative and other concerns before allowing investments in the concerned activity. Similarly, under the FII route, the FIIs registered with the securities market regulator (the Securities and Exchange Board of India – SEBI) can invest in the secondary market, without prior approval, subject to certain limits on individual FIIs and an overall aggregate limit for all FIIs, as a category, as well as the sectoral thresholds and other conditions applicable to FDI. SWFs can also invest directly as an FII or indirectly as a 'sub-account' of a registered FII, which include hedge funds and investment funds. Accordingly, any SWF can invest under the FDI route (automatic or approval routes, as the case may be) or under FII route either directly or indirectly.  Thus, on the inflows, there is generally no discrimination on the basis of the country of origin of the foreign investor or on the basis of category of foreign investors.

        The policy, however, does provide for a framework in regard to ownership and management of the entity investing in some sectors, particularly the financial sector, which is applicable equally to resident as well as non-resident investors.

        In respect of banks, acknowledgement from RBI for acquisition/transfer of shares is required for all cases of acquisition of shares which will take the aggregate holding (direct and indirect, beneficial or otherwise) of an individual or group to equivalent of 5 percent or more of the paid-up capital of the bank. The relevant factors for 'fit and proper' assessment of the investor include the source of funds for the acquisition and, where the investor is a body corporate, its track record of reputation for operating in a manner that is consistent with the standards of good corporate governance, financial strength and integrity. The process also envisages a higher level of due diligence when the share holding of the investor exceeds 10 per cent in the investee bank's paid up capital, which includes fit and proper status of the investor entity. 

        An amendment to the Banking Regulation Act has been proposed which envisages prior approval of the Reserve Bank for acquisition of more than five per cent of the paid up share capital of a bank by any investor 'directly or indirectly, by himself or acting in concert with any person'. The approval will be accorded after ensuring that the investor would be 'fit and proper' from the perspective of public interest, interest of banking policy, emerging trends in banking and international best practices, and the interest of banking and financial system in India.

        In the case of investments in financial market infrastructure companies, such as stock exchanges, the guidelines stipulate a desirable dispersal of ownership. Investment by individual entities, including investments by persons acting in concert, is subject to a threshold of five per cent of the equity in these companies.

        In regard to Securitisation and Reconstruction Companies (SRC), the RBI conducts due diligence on the sponsors / investors before giving a certificate of registration to the SRC. Any subsequent investment by any individual entity in excess of 10 per cent  of the paid up equity capital of the SRC also acquires the status of a 'sponsor' and requires prior permission of RBI which, as the regulator, is required to satisfy itself, among other things, of the 'fit and proper' credentials of the investor.

        Foreign investment in an Indian company in the financial services sector, through acquisitions, requires prior permission of the Reserve Bank which allows such investments only after ensuring that the regulatory concerns, if any, are appropriately addressed and that the bonafides of the overseas investor are satisfactory. Wherever necessary, the clearance or comments of the home country regulators of the investing entity are also sought while examining the requests.

        In case of investments by foreign investors in activities other than the financial services sector, where there are security or other administrative concerns, for instance, in defence and strategic industries, and print media and broadcasting sectors, investments are allowed only under the "approval route".

        In order to assess the eligibility of an entity to be registered as FII or as Foreign Venture Capital Investor, SEBI takes into account all factors relevant to the grant of a certificate and in particular the applicant's track record, professional competence, financial soundness, experience, general reputation of fairness and integrity as well as the fact whether the applicant is regulated by an appropriate foreign regulatory authority.

        In brief, India is yet to consider a policy addressing investments by SWFs, except as a part of due diligence in regard to all investors.

India as a Home Country

        In India, the foreign exchange reserves are on the balance sheet of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and are managed as per the provisions of the RBI Act, consistent with the global best practices. The Reserve Bank adheres to appropriate prudential norms and the transparency and data dissemination standards in regard to reserves management.

        Given the significant increase in the level of foreign exchange reserves, there is an increasing expectation in regard to returns. The returns on the foreign exchange reserves, under the present framework, are constrained by the mandate to Reserve Bank of India, which understandably lays a greater emphasis on safety and liquidity.

        It may, however, be possible to argue that a part of the reserves, which may be considered to be in excess of the usual requirements, be managed with the primary objective of earning higher returns. Given the limitations placed on the central bank by its mandate, it can be held that it will be appropriate to bestow this responsibility on a different sovereign entity.  If and when the country considers setting up of a SWF for the purpose, one of the methodologies could be to fund SWF by purchasing the foreign exchange from the central bank, to the extent required. These foreign currency funds could then be used by the sovereign entity for seeking higher returns by investing in assets, which a central bank's mandate may not permit. As the SWF will be a public enterprise, it will be required to conform to the applicable governance, transparency and disclosure standards.

        While it is possible to make a case for an Indian SWF, there are also weighty arguments for caution in this regard. First, it would be very difficult to reckon in the Indian context – as is the case with many other countries, the 'reserve adequacy' in a dynamic setting and on that basis divert a part of 'excess' reserves for a higher return from riskier assets. The current reserves management policy recognises this, based on experience during periods of both net inflows and outflows and, therefore, the overall approach to the management of India's foreign exchange reserves takes into account the changing composition of the balance of payments and endeavours to reflect the 'liquidity risks' associated with different types of flows and other requirements.

        Second, while most other countries that have set up SWFs have amassed large reserves either on account of persistent current account surpluses or due to revenue gains from commodity exports, in particular of oil and gas, the Indian economy has twin deficits—a current account deficit as also a fiscal deficit.  India's export basket is diversified and does not have any dominant "exportable" natural resource output, which might promise significant revenue gains at the current juncture. 

        Third, India has experienced consistent but manageable current account deficits barring very few years of a modest surplus. India is also having a negative international investment position (IIP) with liabilities far exceeding the assets.  The large reserves have been built, over time, mostly on account of capital flows like foreign direct investments (FDI), portfolio flows through foreign institutional investors (FII), external commercial borrowing (ECB) and short-term credit.  Further, the increasing reserves also reflect, in part, the lower absorption capacity of the economy, which may pick up with the economy moving on to a higher growth trajectory.

        In brief, the public policy is yet to take a conscious view on the desirability of establishing a SWF.    

SPV for Use of Reserves

        In the context of growing developmental needs, particularly of the infrastructure sector, a step in the direction of using a small part of reserves for development has recently been taken after considerable deliberations. An announcement was made by the Finance Minister in the budget Speech 2007-2008 on February 28, 2007  to "use a small part of the foreign exchange reserves without the risk of monetary expansion" for the purpose of financing infrastructure development projects. Accordingly a scheme has been finalized which envisages RBI investing, in tranches, up to an aggregate amount of USD 5 billion in fully Government guaranteed foreign currency denominated bonds issued by an overseas SPV of the India Infrastructure Finance Corporation Ltd. (IIFCL), a wholly owned company of Government of India. The funds, thus raised, are to be utilized by the company for on-lending to the Indian companies implementing infrastructure projects in India and/or to co-finance the ECBs of such projects for capital expenditure outside India without creating any monetary impact. The lending by the SPV under the arrangement would be treated as external commercial borrowings (ECB) and would be subject to the prescribed reporting and disclosure requirements. The bonds will carry a floating rate of interest. The investment by the RBI in the foreign currency denominated bonds issued by the SPV will not be reckoned as a part of the foreign exchange reserves, but will be a foreign currency asset on the RBI balance sheet.

        It is noteworthy that this arrangement is distinct in the sense that India is both a home and a host for the IIFCL's subsidiary, as it is basically a SPV for channelising foreign exchange funds for meeting the requirements of the Indian private sector for infrastructure projects in India by drawing upon the foreign exchange reserves of the country available with the central bank. 

Summing Up

        To sum up, India has not yet considered regulatory initiatives specifically addressing SWFs. Existing provisions in regard to fit-and-proper or take-over code are, however, applicable to all investors, including SWFs. Currently, the pros and cons for the establishment of an Indian SWF, as generally understood now, are still under debate. India is monitoring recent developments in regard to enhancing transparency and disclosure in respect of hedge funds, private equity and SWFs. In particular, India is watching with great interest the development of global codes, standards and practices in regard to SWFs, both in view of the presence of SWFs in the Indian financial markets and the ongoing debate on establishing an Indian SWF.

* Remarks by Dr. Y.V. Reddy, Governor, RBI at a session on 'The Role of Government-owned Investment Vehicles in Global Capital Flows' in the International Capital Markets and Emerging Markets Roundtable held at Washington DC on April 14, 2008.

 


Banks' Relationship with Customers - Evolving Perspectives

Banks' Relationship with Customers - Evolving Perspectives

(Address by Deputy Governor, Ms. Shyamala Gopinath at the 4th M.R.Pai Memorial Award Function organized by the All India Depositors' Association at Mumbai on April 8, 2008)

I feel it a privilege to be associated with today's function as a tribute to the late Mr. M.R.Pai, the doyen of consumer activism in India. He successfully championed the cause of consumers, particularly bank depositors, during a different economic setting when the institutional dynamics were different, particularly for the public sector, and customer as a generic entity had not acquired the high pedestal in public discourses and management meetings. Times have changed. But as a Sanskrit saying goes…kadachit anidrishyam jagat. The world has always been the same and consumer issues in the new economic order remain as pressing as ever, even more so. Even in developed countries issues relating to customer protection and financial inclusion are finding increasing focus. There is as much need for a Mr. Pai today, as it was then in putting across consumer issues to the fore in an effective manner.

In my address today, I intend to share my perspective on the evolving nature of banks' relationship with its individual customers and the new challenges in this regard. The role of banks in intermediation of financial needs of different classes of customers has undergone significant changes. For the sake of convenience, banks' various roles vis-à-vis their customers can be broadly categorized as (i) acceptors of deposits (ii) credit providers (ii) providers of payments and remittances services (iv) provider of foreign exchange services (v) facilitators in circulation of currency notes/coins; and  (vi) providers of financial instruments.

One of the defining features of the process of reforms initiated in the early nineties was the deregulation of interest rates. On the deposit side, interest rates on all deposits, except savings accounts, have been de-regulated. Similarly, on the bank lending, rates to be charged by the banks on most of the credit facilities have been deregulated except a small component for lending related to certain segments. Simultaneously,   in 1993, as per the new licensing policy, fresh licenses were issued to a few private sector banks with the objective of enhancing the level of competition in the sector. One of the expected outcomes of this policy was expanding the reach of banking services, both in qualitative and quantitative terms. Technology emerged as the backbone of banking operations, revolutionizing service delivery through new platforms and channels. But it became evident gradually, these developments created more challenges for the customer in terms of service quality, non-human interface, unsolicited marketing of products, ever-increasing fine-prints on documents etc. all of which got compounded on account of basic financial unawareness on part of the ordinary customer.

Self regulation by the banking industry would have been the ideal redressal for the emerging challenges. But due to heterogeneous and complex nature of the problems coming to light, some regulatory initiative had become necessary. In the mid term review of the Monetary and Credit Policy 2003-2004, it was decided to review the level of public service provided by the Reserve Bank and banks, and to evolve appropriate incentives to facilitate change on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, the Committee on Procedures and Performance Audit on Public Services was set up. The Committee focused on the inadequacy in banking services available to common person and looked into the need to (i) benchmark the current level of service, (ii) review the progress periodically, (iii) enhance the timeliness and quality, (iv) rationalize the processes taking into account technological developments, and (v) suggest appropriate incentives to facilitate change on an ongoing basis. Following the Committee's recommendations, various important customer service regulations were issued, notable among them being the guidelines on facilitating the payment to survivor/nominee of a deceased depositor, simplifying the KYC requirements, collection of cheques and facilitating operations in bank accounts.

Simultaneously, a series of measures was taken to improve the institutional mechanism within as well as outside the banks to improve the quality of customer service.

  • All the banks were advised to constitute a Customer Service Committee of the Board with a view to strengthening the corporate governance structure in the banking system and also to bring about ongoing improvements in the quality of customer service provided by the banks.
  • In order to encourage a formal channel of communication between the customers and the bank at the branch level, banks were advised to take necessary steps for strengthening the branch level customer service committees with greater involvement of customers. Further as senior citizens usually form an important constituency in banks, banks were advised to preferably include a senior citizen in the branch level committees.
  • The Banking Ombudsman Scheme was revised to enlarge the scope of the Scheme to include customer complaints on certain new areas, such as, credit card complaints, deficiencies in providing the promised services even by banks' sales agents, levying service charges without prior notice to the customer and non- adherence to the fair practices code as adopted by individual banks.  The Scheme therefore provides a forum to bank customers to seek redressal of their most common complaints against banks, including those relating to credit cards, service charges, promises given by the sales agents of banks, but not kept by banks, as also, delays in delivery of bank services. The bank customers would be able to complain about non-payment or any inordinate delay in payments or collection of cheques towards bills or remittances by banks, as also non-acceptance of small denomination notes and coins or charging of commission for acceptance of small denomination notes and coins by banks. The present Scheme also allows appeals from both banks and complainants against the decisions of Banking Ombudsmen.
  • Recognising an institutional gap in measuring the performance of the banks against codes and standards based on established best practices, Reserve Bank of India has taken the initiative in setting up the Banking Codes and Standards Board of India (BCSBI). It is an autonomous and independent body, adopting the stance of a self-regulatory organisation in the larger interest of improving the quality of customer services by the Indian banking system. Banks register themselves with the Board as its members and provide services as per the agreed standards and codes. The Board in turn, monitors and assesses the compliance with codes and standards which the banks have agreed to. The registration of banks with the BCSBI, as members, enables the Reserve Bank of India to derive greater supervisory comfort, so also the customers of the member banks. This would also enable the BCSBI to accommodate the bank-specific differences in the customer service related benchmarks set by the banks for themselves. As on date, around 71 banks have joined the BCSBI as members.

I. Deposit Accounts

With regard to account holders, it would be useful, to recollect some of the important incremental measures taken by RBI, which over a period have made significant impact:

  • Banks are required to inform customers upfront about the requirement of minimum balances and the charges if such balances are not maintained. They are also required to inform customers one month in advance any changes in such minimum balances and charges.
  • It has been clarified to banks that NRO accounts can be held jointly with residents
  • In case of collection of cheques , banks are required to formulate and disclose their policy for affording immediate credit, time frame for collection and interest payment for delayed collection, taking care to ensure that the interests of the small depositors are fully protected. The policy should clearly lay down the liability of the banks by way of interest payments due to delays for non-compliance with the standards set by the banks themselves. Compensation by way of interest payment, where necessary, should be made without any claim from the customer.
  • Banks are required to provide both the drop box facility and the facility for acknowledgement of the cheques at the regular collection counters and no branch should refuse to give an acknowledgement if the customer tenders the cheques at the counters.
  • Banks have been advised to ensure that brief, intelligible particulars are invariably entered in passbooks / statements of account and they adhere to the prescribed monthly periodicity while sending statement of accounts.
  • It has been clarified to banks that payment to the survivor /nominee of a deceased depositor where there is a valid nomination or where the account has been opened with a survivorship clause is a valid discharge of liability provided inter alia it has been made clear to the survivor(s) / nominee that he would be receiving the payment from the bank as a trustee of the legal heirs of the deceased depositor, i.e., such payment to him shall not affect the right or claim which any person may have against the survivor(s) / nominee to whom the payment is made. In such cases insistence on production of legal representation is unwarranted and would, invite serious supervisory disapproval. In such case, therefore, while making payment to the survivor(s) / nominee of the deceased depositor, the banks have to desist from insisting on production of succession certificate, letter of administration or probate, etc., or obtain any bond of indemnity or surety from the survivor(s)/nominee, irrespective of the amount standing to the credit of the deceased account holder.
  • In case where the deceased depositor had not made any nomination or for the accounts other than those styled as 'either or survivor' (such as single or jointly operated accounts), banks have been told to adopt a simplified procedure for repayment to legal heir(s) of the depositor keeping in view the imperative need to avoid inconvenience and undue hardship to the common person. In this context, banks may, keeping in view their risk management systems, fix a minimum threshold limit, for the balance in the account of the deceased depositors, up to which claims in respect of the deceased depositors could be settled without insisting on production of any documentation other than a letter of indemnity.
  • In the case of term deposits, banks are advised to incorporate a clause in the account opening form itself to the effect that in the event of the death of the depositor, premature termination of term deposits would be allowed. The conditions subject to which such premature withdrawal would be permitted may also be specified in the account opening form. Such premature withdrawal would not attract any penal charge.
  • In order to avoid hardship to the survivor(s) / nominee of a deposit account, banks are advised to obtain appropriate agreement / authorization from the survivor(s) / nominee with regard to the treatment of pipeline flows in the name of the deceased account holder.
  • Banks are advised to settle the claims in respect of deceased depositors and release payments to survivor(s) / nominee(s) within a period not exceeding 15 days from the date of receipt of the claim subject to the production of proof of death of the depositor and suitable identification of the claim(s), to the bank's satisfaction.
  • Information should not be gathered in the name of KYC with the intention of using it for cross-selling of services. The banks should obtain the information required for opening an account independent of any other information that they may seek for cross-selling purposes with the consent of the customer. The forms containing this information must not be a part of the account opening form.
  • the KYC procedure for opening accounts for those persons who intend to keep balances not exceeding rupees fifty thousand (Rs. 50,000/-) in all their accounts taken together and the total credit in all the accounts taken together is not expected to exceed rupees one lakh (Rs. 1,00,000/-) in a year has been simplified to enable those belonging to low income groups without documents of identity and proof of residence to open banks accounts. In such cases banks can take introduction from an account holder on whom full KYC procedure has been completed and has had satisfactory transactions with the bank for at least six months. Photograph of the customer who proposes to open the account and his address need to be certified by the introducer. Recently, clarification had also been issued to facilitate account opening by close relatives, e.g. wife, son, daughter and parents etc. who live with their husband, father/mother and son, as the case may be, who may not have the utility bills required for address verification in their name.

II. Bank Lending

On the lending side, guidelines were issued on Fair Practices Code for Lenders, including  comprehensive details in loan applications and conveying reasons for rejection of loans.

In terms of the guidelines banks / FIs are required to ensure that loan application forms in respect of priority sector advances up to Rs.2.00 lakhs contains comprehensive information about the fees / charges and any other matter which affects the interest of the borrower. The Guidelines were further revised to ensure that all loan applications in respect of all categories of loans irrespective of the amount of loan sought by the borrower contains comprehensive information about fees / charges etc.

Banks / FIs are also required to convey in writing, the main reason/reasons which have led to rejection of the loan applications in case of all categories of loans irrespective of any threshold limits, including credit card applications.

RBI has issued comprehensive Credit Card Guidelines relating to credit card operations of banks/NBFCs in November 2005. These guidelines have been issued aimed at encouraging growth of credit cards in a safe, secure and efficient manner as well as to ensure that the rules, regulations, standards and practices of the card issuing banks are in alignment with the best customer practices.  These guidelines address issues relating to billing, use of Direct Selling Agents (DSAs) and other agents, protection of customer rights, customer confidentiality, fair practices in debt collection, redressal of grievances, etc. Master Circular on the issue has since been  issued.

Measures for ensuring reasonableness of service charges : Reserve Bank has made it obligatory for banks to display and update, in their offices/branches as also on their websites, the details of various service charges in a prescribed format. The banks are also required to display the service charges and fees on the homepage of their website at a prominent place under the title of 'Service Charges and Fees' so as to facilitate easy access to the bank customers. Reserve Bank has also placed a web-link to these web pages of banks in its website to facilitate comparison of service charges and thereby enabling the customer to take an informed decision. A Working Group was also set up to look into the issue of reasonableness of bank charges, which submitted its Report in August 2006. The Working Group indicated broad principles of reasonableness that banks should adopt in fixing and notifying the service charges for providing basic services to individuals. Guidelines have been issued to the banks based on the recommendations of the Working Group and steps taken by the banks in this regard are being examined.

Instructions to guard against incidence of excessive interest rates & charges

Based on feedback that excessive interest and charges were being levied on certain loans and advances, banks were advised to lay out appropriate internal principles and procedures so that usurious interest, including processing and other charges, are not levied by them on small value loans, particularly personal loans and such other loans of similar nature. Banks are also required to fix appropriate ceiling on the interest, including processing and other charges that could be levied on such loans, which may be suitably publicised.

III. Foreign Exchange

Over the last two decades, there has been a paradigm shift in the foreign exchange regime in India. The approach of conservation and preservation of foreign exchange has been replaced with a liberal framework aimed at facilitation of external trade and payments and orderly development of foreign exchange markets. In the process, the RBI has moved beyond the role of a regulator to that of a facilitator of foreign exchange transactions.

Several measures have been taken to expand the delivery channels of foreign exchange services for reducing transaction costs and to undertake external transactions in a hassle free manner. These measures include -    licensing of a new category of entities as AD category-II to handle non-trade related current account transactions and licensing of select Urban Cooperative Banks and RRBs as well to operate as AD Cat-II. In addition, the norms for the Full Fledged Money Changers have been reviewed and the ADs have been permitted to enter into franchisee arrangements for provision of money changing facilities. Further, measures have been taken to simpify procedures in respect of  cross-border flows through Exchange Houses (Rupee Drawing Arrangements) .

Resident individuals have been permitted to make remittances overseas up to USD 200,000 per financial year for undertaking any of the permitted current or capital account transactions or a combination of both. Only requirements are a designated bank account, PAN number and a simple declaration.

The critical issue at this juncture is for the banks to ensure efficient customer service by equipping the frontline staff with up-dated instructions and bring about an attitudinal change in their approach towards foreign exchange business. It is disconcerting to note that the incognito visits to various banks have revealed that the services delivered at various banks are deficient and insistence on unwarranted or complex documents continues for individuals. Another issue is the reluctance of the banks to extend service to walk-in customers for handling their small value transactions. We have been sensitizing banks to these issues. 

The steps taken by the RBI in liberalizing the forex regulations, delegating authority to the ADs and simplify the procedures is basically designed to extend the forex services to the residents and non-residents in a simple and hassle free manner with minimal documentation. 

IV. Payment Systems

The traditional role of banks as providers of various payment and settlement services to customers is getting redefined.   Until recently, requirements of customers, be it corporate or retail, were determined and extended by banks based on their perception and understanding of customer necessities.  This to a large extent was also dictated by the banks' ability to offer such products.  The scenario is fast changing and changing for the better.  Now, the banks are encouraged to innovate and tailor products to suit various segments of customers, apart from being more sensitive to their demands.  Competition between banks for market share and the emergence of other service providers are other reasons for this push.

It is also necessary to put into context the magnitude of challenges that are ahead of us.  The paper clearing volumes we handle is the sixth largest in the world with a volume of 1.44 billion cheques cleared during the year 2007.  The RBI has launched  the Cheque Truncation System in the National Capital Region of New Delhi on February 1, 2008 with the participation of 10 banks in the pilot run.  Once fully operational, the system will be the largest in the world and leapfrog the country into migrating the paper based instruments to the electronic mode.   The electronic suite of products is continuously expanding in terms of coverage of branches, volume of transactions and number of users availing the facility.  The Reserve Bank has intervened and mandated (a) reasonability in pricing of transactions effected through ATMs, (b) compulsory use of electronic mode of initiating transactions above a specified cut-off limit, (c) strengthening the payment systems infrastructure, etc. 

Whilst the clearing cycle operating across the country on a T+1 basis for cheques payable locally, favourably compares with the best in the world, it is necessary to look into the entire cycle from the time a customer deposits a cheque at a branch till the point of realisation of credit in his account.   There is scope for continuous improvement in overall cycle.  Going by the number of complaints, it is felt that customer-service in this area is not customer-centric.  Albeit the fact that electronic payment products are improving their share in the overall retail portfolio, the volume of paper instruments would continue to be significant in the near future as well. 

The share of electronic payment products like RTGS, NEFT and ECS is rising by the day and the number of branches which are offering this facility is also increasing.  Notwithstanding this, the share of public sector banks in the electronic product usage is very less.  It is necessary to make available these products across all bank branches.  While the build-up should continue, banks need to also concentrate on reaching geographical areas and segments of populace that have not been embraced by this expansion.  It is difficult to achieve financial inclusion without involving rural-India in the payment system out-reach and those banks who do so first, will reap the benefits of increase in volumes and increase in market-share, leading to concomitant increase in revenues, and of-course increase in other businesses as well.  And as we all know, the electronic medium is location independent, can leave a better audit-trail and will surely improve customer involvement and service expectations.  It is our vision that electronic products reach 50% of volume and 95% of value by the end of March 2009.

Banks need to adopt a 'STOCK' approach while conceiving and bringing out products.  Products that are 'Secure and scalable', Transparent in terms and conditions of usage, Operationally resilient and efficient, Cost-effective and reasonably priced, and Knowledgeable to staff and customers.  The customers have an equal if not higher responsibility to ensure banks adopt this approach while innovating products for them

V. Currency Management

As per the provisions of Reserve Bank of India Act 1934, RBI is statutorily required to undertake certain activities in the area of currency management. In view of the fact that RBI has its Offices only at state capitals or at large centres, the services of commercial banks are used to store banknotes on behalf of the Reserve Bank in the currency chests held at designated branches. These bank branches may operate on the balances of the currency chests as per their requirements with correct and timely reporting being their responsibility. A decision has also been taken to provide the currency chest facility to private sector and foreign banks with 99 currency chests being held by these banks. Further, now the Urban Cooperative Bank and RRBs are also allowed to hold the facility. These steps would improve the availability of banknotes and coins across the country.

The channel of currency chests is used not only for distributing banknotes and coins but also for collecting back the soiled notes. While the banks are under instructions to sort the banknotes before depositing them into the currency chest, it was observed that meaningful sorting was not done as evident from a number of reissuable notes being retrieved at the level of the Reserve Bank regional offices. To overcome this, all the banks were advised to install Note Sorting Machines at their currency chests, a task that has been completed. To carry the Clean Note Policy further, banks have been instructed to process all of their daily receipts over Note Sorting Machines and keep a daily record thereof. It may be mentioned here that banks are already under instructions by way of a Directive under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act 1949 on non-stapling of banknotes, issue only good quality of banknotes and not to write anything on the watermark portion. This would be evident from the general improvement in the quality of notes in circulation.

Further, to extend the reach of channels for distribution of coins, the services of Post Offices, Urban Cooperative Banks and Regional Rural Banks are being used in view of their wide reach to the members of general public. 

VI. Financial Education and Inclusion

Lastly, let me come to the very significant aspect of financial inclusion which has been pursued with a missionary purpose by the Reserve Bank of India during the last four years. Given the socio-demographic complexities in India, the endeavour has been towards a multi-institutional and multi-instrumental approach to comprehensively address the issue of financial inclusion in all its entirety, going beyond mere availability of credit.   By financial inclusion we mean the provision of affordable financial services, viz., access to payments and remittance facilities, savings, loans and insurance services by the formal financial system to those who tend to be excluded.

Globally the issue of financial inclusion has now assumed significance not merely in developing countries but also in developed countries. RBI started a focused drive in this regard in 2004.

In the Annual Policy of the Reserve Bank for 2004-05, the Governor, Dr. Reddy observed and I quote –

"There has been expansion, greater competition and diversification of ownership of banks leading to both enhanced efficiency and systemic resilience in the banking sector. However, there are legitimate concerns in regard to the banking practices that tend to exclude rather than attract vast sections of population, in particular pensioners, self-employed and those employed in unorganised sector. While commercial considerations are no doubt important, the banks have been bestowed with several privileges, especially of seeking public deposits on a highly leveraged basis, and consequently they should be obliged to provide banking services to all segments of the population, on equitable basis."

Pursuant to this, the Reserve Bank has undertaken a number of measures with the objective of attracting the financially excluded population into the structured financial system going beyond credit to a whole range of financial services.

  • In November 2005, banks were advised to make available a basic banking 'no-frills' account with low or nil minimum balances as well as charges to expand the outreach of such accounts to vast sections of the population. Banks are required to make available all printed material used by retail customers in the concerned regional language.

 

  • In order to ensure that persons belonging to low income group, both in urban and rural areas do not encounter difficulties in opening bank accounts, the know your customer (KYC) procedures for opening accounts has been simplified for those persons with balances not exceeding Rs 50000/- (about GBP 600) and credits in the accounts not exceeding Rs.100000/- (about GBP 1200) in a year. The simplified procedure allows introduction by a customer on whom full KYC drill has been followed.  
  • Banks have been asked to consider introduction of a General purpose Credit Card (GCC) facility up to Rs. 25000/- at their rural and semi urban braches. The credit facility is in the nature of revolving credit entitling the holder to withdraw upto the limit sanctioned. Based on assessment of household cash flows, the limits are sanctioned without insistence on security or purpose. Interest rate on the facility is completely deregulated.
  •   In January 2006, banks were permitted to utilise the services of non-governmental organisations (NGOs/SHGs), micro-finance institutions and other civil society organisations as intermediaries in providing financial and banking services through the use of business facilitator and business correspondent (BC) models. The BC model allows banks to do 'cash in - cash out' transactions at the location of the BC and allows branchless banking.
  • Other measures include setting up pilots for credit counselling and financial education. A multilingual website in 13 Indian languages on all matters concerning banking and the common person has been launched by the Reserve Bank on 18 June 2007.

The key driver in the success of these initiatives would undoubtedly be technology. Technology today provides a lever which can enable multilevel leapfrogging in pursuit of financial inclusion. Andhra Pradesh has started a project that aims to improve the mechanism for paying pensions and unemployment benefits to around half a million people in villages in the Karimnagar and Warangal regions of the state. It is a tiny start—so far some 40,000 cards have been issued—but the potential is clear. The initiative is to have a bank tie up and extend this model to other places and states.

The role of financial literacy in this regard can't be over-emphasised. As noted by the Economist in a recent issue, a global crusade is under way to teach personal finance to the masses. Governments from USA to Britain to Russia are declaring their commitment to financial education. This month the World Savings Banks Institute, which represents retail and savings banks from 92 countries, will hold a summit in Brussels about financial education in the light of the sub-prime crisis. There is also an exhortation to the policy makers to simplify the choices available to people in financial matters, quoting the Swedish savings plan for old age, which offers a choice of funds to invest in but also includes a low-cost default option, chosen by 90% of the people.

Financial education has an ever more critical role to play in the changed financial landscape of India which, while on one hand has presented with newer opportunities for future collective growth, on the other, it has also heightened fears of uncertainty in certain quarters mainly because of increasing multi-faceted choices and options in the management of personal finances and exposure to a gamut of risks. Financial education could ideally supplement the financial inclusion initiatives for long term efficacy. RBI has recently put out a concept paper on setting up Financial Literacy and Counseling Centres with the objective of providing free financial literacy/education and credit counselling. The specific objectives of the proposed FLCCs would be:

  • To educate the people in rural and urban areas with regard to various financial products and services available from the formal financial sector
  • To make the people aware of the advantages of being connected with the formal financial sector ;
  • To provide face-to-face financial counselling services, including education on responsible borrowing and offering debt counselling to individuals who are indebted to formal and/or informal financial sectors;
  • To formulate debt restructuring plans for borrowers in distress and recommend the same to formal financial institutions, including cooperatives, for consideration ;
  • To take up any such activity that promotes financial literacy, awareness of the banking products, financial planning and amelioration of debt-related distress of an individual; and
  • To take up any other activity that facilitates the above.

Once feedback is received, the initiative could be carried forward in consultation with all stakeholders.

Conclusion

I would like to conclude by quoting from one of Governor Dr. Reddy's speech:

"Banking is a trust-based relationship and the banking licence from the regulator provides an assurance of trust to the public at large. To the banks, the banking licence provides the privilege of accepting uncollateralised deposits from the public. However, the acts of stealth banking, negative option marketing, misleading advertisements, information gathering from customers for cross selling of products and services, and tie-up arrangements are inconsistent with the concept of a trust-based relationship. The lack of transparency, coupled with the difficulty of consumers in identifying key information from the large volume of material and communication in fine print, leads to an information asymmetry, which renders the banker-customer relationship one of unequals."

The broad approach of RBI is to empower the common person where banking services are concerned and strengthen customer-service delivery in banks by adopting a consultative process with banks, through the IBA. Specifically, the focus is on:

a) Sensitising banks to customer service and encouraging the involvement of the Boards of the banks, especially to strengthen the banks own grievance redressal machinery

b) Insisting on transparency in all the dealings with the customers, and ensuring reasonableness in pricing.

c) Promoting adherence to self imposed codes by banks on commitments to bank customers and monitoring compliance by an independent agency, viz. BCSBI.

d) Strengthening the mechanism for dispute resolution.

e) Using regulation/prescription only when essential, while encouraging the industry association (IBA) to take initiatives.

f) Rationalising RBI's own systems and procedures.

It is a constant endeavour to meet the above objectives and collectively, I am sure we can build a customer-oriented banking culture and, through the initiatives on financial inclusion, achieve democratization of the financial sector.

Address by Deputy Governor, Ms. Shyamala Gopinath at the 4th M.R.Pai Memorial Award Function organized by the All India Depositors' Association at Mumbai on April 8, 2008.

 


India : The Global Partner

India : The Global Partner

(Introductory Remarks by Dr. Y V Reddy, Governor, Reserve Bank of India at the World Leaders' Forum, Columbia University, New York, on April 15, 2008)

Dean Coatsworth, Professor Bhagwati, Professor Radon, students, faculty and alumni of Columbia University, and members of the wider New York City Community.

I am grateful to President Bollinger for extending me an invitation to participate in the prestigious World Leaders Forum at the Low Memorial Library. Distinguished past speakers at the Forum include, I am informed, President Clinton, President Putin, The Dalai Lama and Noble laureate Joseph Stiglitz. I am greatly honoured by the invitation and look forward to the informal dialogue with the highly respected Dr. Jagdish Bhagwati.

By way of an introduction, I will present select aspects of the engagement of independent India with the global polity and economy.

While India became independent on 15th August 1947, it became a Republic on 26th January 1950, with the adoption of a written Constitution which is governing the nation. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the architect of the Indian Constitution, had the benefit of education at the Columbia University where he obtained a Ph.D. Prof. John Dewey inspired many of Dr. Ambedkar's ideas about equality and social justice. Prof. Edwin Seligman, himself a friend of Lala Lajpat Rai, the legendary fiery freedom fighter of India, became a mentor to the young Ambedkar. Dr. Ambedkar also benefitted from his research and education in London. These are examples of how India's freedom movement and the Constitution, that binds our governance today, have benefitted from partnering with the global scholarship, in general, and with the special relationship with Columbia University and the United States, in particular. Incidentally, the Columbia University conferred an honorary degree on the first Prime Minister of India, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, on his first visit to the US soon after our independence.

An important characteristic of the global society is the sheer diversity of races, religions, cultures, ideologies and languages. India has the distinction of reflecting, in itself, the great diversity of the global society. For example, India is a home to the largest number of people practising Zoroastrianism – who are also known as Parsees. Two of India's provinces are governed by communist parties. In fact, we are a unique federation where the boundaries of existing provinces are redrawn and new provinces are created, to accommodate aspirations, while remaining strictly within the provisions of the Constitution. We have several national languages in which governments' businesses are conducted. Every currency note that you see in India has the denomination written in seventeen languages with different scripts. In brief, independent India believes firmly, in dialogue, accommodation and assimilation of multiple identities of people.

These characteristics enable the Indian people and the Indian corporates to live and work harmoniously alongside other nationalities.

India's record as a responsible nation in honouring its commitments is well known. Specifically, independent India has never reneged on its monetary obligations to the rest of the world and has not sought any noticeable rescheduling of its payment obligations. In 1991, we had a liquidity crisis in currency, mainly due to the war in Iraq and the breakdown of trade with USSR, but we preferred to pledge gold, initiate a massive import compression and start a reform process with assistance from the IMF and the World Bank. The entire burden of crisis and adjustment was successfully borne by the domestic economy.

            In the current environment of financial turbulence, and also a possible unwinding of macro imbalances, India plays a stabilising role with a modest current account deficit in most of the recent years, at around one per cent of GDP, and a market determined exchange rate. India has not been contributing to the global macro economic imbalances, though it has a stake in how the issues get resolved in the near future.

            Currently, there is a debate on the role of Sovereign Wealth Funds. India is in receipt of investments from several of them either directly or indirectly, and hence, is interested in the current debate. For its part, the country's foreign exchange reserves amounting to about US$ 300 billion continue to be managed by the Reserve Bank of India, typically as per mandate similar to those of other central banks around the world and consistent with the IMF guidelines. However, the Indian corporates, based on account of their own commercial judgements, take investment positions and merge or acquire other undertakings in other countries. Public policy neither provides incentives nor disincentives for such market based initiatives by the Indian corporates.

            India's external sector has displayed considerable strength and resilience since the reforms in 1991 – despite several domestic as well as global political events and supply shocks in food and fuel. Interestingly, India's external trade in goods and services as a percentage of GDP is more than that of the United States (at 48 per cent and 29 per cent respectively), and is, in a way, indicative of the extent of India's trade integration with the global economy. India is fully convertible on the current account, but we do have requirements of repatriation and surrender of export earnings to ensure that capital account transactions do not take place under the guise of current account. Capital account is almost fully open to non-residents, well regulated financial institutions, and corporates. In regard to residents, capital account is almost fully open to resident corporates and partially open to individuals and financial intermediaries. In brief, we partner with the global economy fully on the trade and the current account while there is progressive liberalisation of the capital account, consistent with the progress in reforms in the real, fiscal, and financial sectors.

            The current turbulence in financial markets and institutions – particularly in the USA, has raised enquiries about the possible contagion. The money, government securities and foreign exchange markets have been stable in India and, in our view, they may not be vulnerable in terms of direct and first-round effects. However, the Indian equity markets, which often reflect global trends, have been volatile in the recent months and that has some impact on changing sentiments. We have a bank-dominated financial sector, and banks have a strong capital base.

In response to the global developments and the rapid growth in money supply, credit, and asset prices in India, we have since 2004 increased, in regard to banks, the risk weights and the provisioning requirements, and decreased or rationalised the exposure limits to select sectors. These were combined with prudential stipulations on off-balance sheet items and relationships between banks and non-bank finance companies. Several safeguards have been built in terms of prudential guidelines and access to repo markets to guard against liquidity-related problems to banks. Above all, withdrawal of monetary accommodation commenced in 2004 and has been gradually fine-tuned, remaining sensitive to early signs of overheating, while related prudential measures were addressing exposure of banks to risks in assets. Hence, in our assessment, the Indian financial sector is likely to be less affected by the contagion than most other EMEs, in respect of first-round or direct effects.

            A few words about the state of the Indian real economy may be in order. The annual growth in real GDP since 2003-04 has averaged 8.7 per cent. Investments and savings as percentage of GDP have been in excess of 30 per cent since 2004-05§ thus indicating a potential for continued growth in output and productivity over the medium term. Similarly, like most of the rest of the world, India has, by and large, experienced benign inflationary conditions averaging around 5.2 per cent since 2004-05**. However, at this juncture, both domestic output and prices are under some pressure due to recent global developments with regard to the prices of food, fuel and metals, and the turbulence in the financial markets.

            Our main challenges are eradication of poverty, efficient use of water, reviving growth in agriculture, improving physical and social infrastructure, upgrading human skills and, above all, fiscal empowerment coupled with the increasing real sector flexibility. Our strengths mainly are the demographic dividend, the stability of the political system, and the emergence of a very broad based and growing entrepreneurial class, which has a penchant for innovation. In overcoming the challenges and taking advantage of the strengths, our engagement with global economies, in particular with the United States, is bound to play a very critical role.

            We are optimistic about a continued mutually beneficial engagement with the global economy. Indians are providing services in various parts of the world – U.S.A., Middle East, U.K. and East Asia. Their services range from the less skilled, at one end of the spectrum, to the very highly skilled professionals at the other end. Their annual contribution by way of remittances is about three per cent of GDP now. These are in addition to export of services, especially software which are of the same order. Indians are among the most significant foreign students to attend the universities for higher education in USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Singapore, China, etc.

Following sustained higher growth in India, a reverse process of brain flow has also commenced by way of foreign nationals and expatriate Indians expressing their interest for pursuing more fruitful ventures in India. As a result, corresponding trade and private business linkages have also started growing. To illustrate, recently a globally active bank has launched a product in India - "Account for Expatriates" - for providing value-added services for the rapidly growing expatriate community in India. 

This engagement with the global economy has matured into a self reinforcing process as benefits are perceived by many and they are percolating to a large number of people in India.

Given the diversity of India in respect of social, political and financial systems, public policy considerations demand that India's integration with the global economy be managed through a participative and consultative manner, and in a gradual fashion.

I look forward to an engaging, educative and enlightening interactive session.

Thank you.

* Introductory Remarks by Dr. Y V Reddy, Governor, Reserve Bank of India at the World Leaders' Forum, Columbia University, New York, on April 15, 2008

0.4 % in 2004-05; 1.2 % in 2005-06; and 1.1 % in 2006-07

2003-04 to 2007-08

§ 2004-05 to 2006-07

** 2004-05 to 2007-08 (till week ended March 22, 2008)